3 Wikipedia: Discourse Communities

The following text is taken from Wikipedia.  It is licensed under the Creative Commons Share Alike license.

 

Discourse communities are studied in the larger field of genre analysis*. Related terms include Miller’s “rhetorical community”[1] and, focusing on the communication rather than the community, Yates & Orlikowski’s “genres of organizational communication”[2]

Regarding contemporary rhetorical communities, Zappen, et al., stated, “Thus a contemporary rhetorical community is less a collection of people joined by shared beliefs and values than a public space or forum that permits these people to engage each other and form limited or local communities of belief.”[3]Incorporating this factor suggests an introduction to a democratic system in discourse communities and has also been educationally termed “Accountable Talk” by researchers,[4] indicating the diversity of communities.[5]

The term discourse community started to lose favor among scholars in the early 2000s, with community of practice** being used in place of discourse community. Swales suggested that discourse communities have shared goals, yet academic communities do not have meaningful shared goals.[6] The term discourse community is not yet well defined, which raises questions that could be the cause of the term’s fall from favor.[7]

*Genre studies is an academic subject which studies genre theory as a branch of general critical theory in several different fields, including art, literature, linguistics, rhetoric and composition studies.

**A community of practice (CoP) is a group of people who “share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly”.[1] The concept was first proposed by cognitive anthropologist Jean Lave and educational theorist Etienne Wenger in their 1991 book Situated Learning (Lave & Wenger 1991). Wenger then significantly expanded on the concept in his 1998 book Communities of Practice (Wenger 1998).


  1. Miller, Carolyn R. "Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre." Genre and the new rhetoric (1994): 67–78.
  2. JoAnne Yates and Wanda J. Orlikowski. "Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media." Academy of Management Review 17.2 (1992): 299–326.
  3. Zappen, James P., Laura J. Gurak, and Stephen Doheny-Farina. "Rhetoric, Community, and Cyberspace." Rhetoric Review 1997: 400. JSTOR Journals. Web. 10 Oct. 2015.
  4. Ardasheva, Yuliya; Howell, Penny B.; Magaña Margarita, Vidrio (September 2016). "Accessing the Classroom Discourse Community Through Accountable Talk: English Learners' Voices". TESOL Journal. 7 (3): 667–99. doi:10.1002/tesj.237. ISSN 1949-3533. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  5. Vadacs, Bea (April 2011). "Banal Nationalism, Football, and Discourse Community in Africa" (Print/web). Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 11 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9469.2011.01105.x. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  6. Borg, Erik. Discourse communities (ELT Journal 57:4)
  7. Swales, John (2011). "The Concept of Discourse Community" (PDF). In Wardle, Elizabeth; Downs, Doug (eds.). Writing About Writing: A College Reader. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's. pp. 215–227. ISBN 978-1-4576-3694-3.
definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Wikipedia: Discourse Communities Copyright © 2021 by Rafe Posey is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book